STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) vs Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands
Which one is worth buying now, with today's prices and each game's recommendation.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands wins 10 of 14 head-to-head metrics. STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) is R$14.01 cheaper.
Metric by metric
The winner of each row gets a ✓. No row weighs more than another; the recommendation is calculated separately.
| Metric | STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) | Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands |
|---|---|---|
| GameValio scoreRecommendation: Maybe × Maybe | 61 | 64 |
| Quality | 88 | 66 |
| Value | 44 | 66 |
| Popularity | 38 | 41 |
| Current Best Price (BRL) | R$ 32.99 | R$ 47.00 |
| Steam Review Score | 94.4% positive | 78.9% positive |
| Average Concurrent Players (14 days) | 111 | 2.4K |
Where to buy
The 3 cheapest stores for each game
STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005)
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands
Side by side over time
STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005)Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands
Details and requirements
| Item | STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) | Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands |
|---|---|---|
| Release date | July 8, 2009 | March 6, 2017 |
| Developers | Pandemic Studios | Ubisoft Belgrade, Ubisoft Montpellier |
| Publishers | Disney, Lucasfilm | Ubisoft |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows |
| OS (minimum) | — | Originally released for Windows 7, the game can be played on Windows 10 and Windows 11 OS |
| Processor (minimum) | — | Intel Core i7- 3770@ 3.5 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4 GHz or better |
| Memory (minimum) | — | 8 GB RAM |
| Graphics (minimum) | — | NVIDIA GeForce GTX970/GTX 1060 or AMD R9 390/RX480 (4GB VRAM with Shader Model 5.0 or better) |
| Storage (minimum) | — | 50 GB available space |
| Sound Card (minimum) | — | DirectX-compatible using the latest drivers |
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) or Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands?
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands won the comparison against STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) based on the head-to-head metric breakdown. Check the metrics table above for a full side-by-side analysis.
How is the comparison calculated?
The comparison winner is determined objectively by counting which game wins more individual metrics in the head-to-head table. No weighting is applied. The GameValio Recommendation shown separately is our own suggestion for each game, based on a weighted score that combines quality (reviews), popularity (player counts), and affordability (price vs value) into a score out of 100. These are two different things: the comparison is objective, the recommendation is GameValio's opinion.
Is STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) worth buying over Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands?
Based on the metrics, Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands won the direct comparison. However, also check the GameValio Recommendation for each game and the price comparison table to make the most informed purchase decision.
Which game has better player reviews?
Review score trends and volume over time are shown in the charts section above. The game with consistently higher positive ratios has stronger community reception.
Which game offers better value for money?
The affordability score and price comparison table above highlight the best deals. Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands currently scores better on value relative to its quality and price.
Related comparisons
Analysis updated: Oct 24, 2026, 02:08 PM UTC

