EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New DespairVSSerious Sam Classic: The First Encounter
Which is the smarter buy right now? We crunched all the metrics.
EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair
Better Deal· Kinguin
Serious Sam Classic: The First Encounter
Better Deal· SteamWinner
EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair wins the comparison based on the metrics. Takes 9 of 15 head-to-head metrics.
The stars are aligning for this one. At this moment, the game is delivering well and the price feels right.
Head-to-Head Metrics
Direct metric-by-metric breakdown · no weights applied
The stars are aligning for this one. At this moment, the game is delivering well and the price feels right.
Worth keeping an eye on. Currently sitting in a decent spot, but not quite a must-buy just yet.
Statistics Over Time
Synchronized historical data for both games
Player Count Trends
— Concurrent players over timeReview Score Trends
— Positive review ratio over timeReview Volume Trends
— Total reviews accumulated over time
Score Breakdown
Side-by-side value analysis for each game
EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair
Quality
Overwhelmingly positive reviews — the vast majority of players recommend it.
Value
Price is reasonable for what the game offers.
Popularity
Activity a bit low — loyal community but no instant queues.
Serious Sam Classic: The First Encounter
Quality
Overwhelmingly positive reviews — the vast majority of players recommend it.
Value
Price too high for what's offered — better options available.
Popularity
Declining player base — could be a problem for multiplayer-dependent games.
Game Details
Release information and metadata
System Requirements
PC minimum and recommended specs
EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair
Recommended
- OS *: Windows 7 64bit, Windows 8.1 64bit Windows 10 64bit
- Processor: 3.2GHz 4Core
- Memory: 8 GB RAM
- Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 7970 / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 （3GB Model or higher）
- DirectX: Version 11
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Storage: 8 GB available space
- Sound Card: DirectX 11 sound device
- Additional Notes: XInput Controller
Serious Sam Classic: The First Encounter
Recommended
- Processor: AMD Athlon 650MHz or Pentium III 650MHz range processor
- Memory: 128MB
- Graphics: nVidia GeForce256 or TNT2 ultra, PowerVR Kyro, S3 Savage2000, 3Dfx Voodoo3, ATI Rage128 pro
- Hard Drive: 700MB free hard disk space
- Sound: Creative Labs SoundBlaster Live
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair or Serious Sam Classic: The First Encounter?
EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair won the comparison against Serious Sam Classic: The First Encounter based on the head-to-head metric breakdown. Check the metrics table above for a full side-by-side analysis.
How is the comparison calculated?
The comparison winner is determined objectively by counting which game wins more individual metrics in the head-to-head table — no weighting is applied. The GameValio Recommendation shown separately is our own suggestion for each game, based on a weighted score that combines quality (reviews), popularity (player counts), and affordability (price vs value) into a score out of 100. These are two different things: the comparison is objective, the recommendation is GameValio's opinion.
Is EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair worth buying over Serious Sam Classic: The First Encounter?
Based on the metrics, EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair won the direct comparison. However, also check the GameValio Recommendation for each game and the price comparison table to make the most informed purchase decision.
Which game has better player reviews?
Review score trends and volume over time are shown in the charts section above. The game with consistently higher positive ratios has stronger community reception.
Which game offers better value for money?
The affordability score and price comparison table above highlight the best deals. EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair currently scores better on value relative to its quality and price.
Analysis updated: Jun 3, 2026, 10:24 PM UTC