Cubic OdysseyVSSmalland: Survive the Wilds
Which is the smarter buy right now? We crunched all the metrics.
Cubic Odyssey
Better Deal· Kinguin
Smalland: Survive the Wilds
Better Deal· KinguinWinner
Smalland: Survive the Wilds wins the comparison based on the metrics. Takes 7 of 12 head-to-head metrics.
Worth keeping an eye on. Currently sitting in a decent spot, but not quite a must-buy just yet.
Head-to-Head Metrics
Direct metric-by-metric breakdown · no weights applied
Worth keeping an eye on. Currently sitting in a decent spot, but not quite a must-buy just yet.
Worth keeping an eye on. Currently sitting in a decent spot, but not quite a must-buy just yet.
Statistics Over Time
Synchronized historical data for both games
Player Count Trends
— Concurrent players over timeReview Score Trends
— Positive review ratio over timeReview Volume Trends
— Total reviews accumulated over time
Score Breakdown
Side-by-side value analysis for each game
Cubic Odyssey
Quality
Splits opinions — likely to click if you're already a genre fan.
Value
Acceptable value right now — fair price for the content.
Popularity
Lost much of its active player base — community is quiet.
Smalland: Survive the Wilds
Quality
Polarizing title that works well for its target audience but may frustrate others.
Value
Price near historical low — a solid moment to consider buying.
Popularity
Past its peak but still active — niche experience.
Game Details
Release information and metadata
System Requirements
PC minimum and recommended specs
Cubic Odyssey
Recommended
- Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
- OS: Windows 10
- Processor: Intel Core i5 6500 or AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Memory: 16 GB RAM
- Graphics: nVidia RTX 3060 or AMD RX 6600-XT with 6GB+ of VRAM
- DirectX: Version 11
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Storage: 6 GB available space
- Additional Notes: SSD strongly recommended
Smalland: Survive the Wilds
Recommended
- Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
- OS: Windows 10 (64-bit versions)
- Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9700 CPU @ 3.00GHz or equivalent
- Memory: 16 GB RAM
- Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 or equivalent
- DirectX: Version 12
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Storage: 20 GB available space
- Additional Notes: 1080p 60 fps on Ultra settings
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: Cubic Odyssey or Smalland: Survive the Wilds?
Smalland: Survive the Wilds won the comparison against Cubic Odyssey based on the head-to-head metric breakdown. Check the metrics table above for a full side-by-side analysis.
How is the comparison calculated?
The comparison winner is determined objectively by counting which game wins more individual metrics in the head-to-head table — no weighting is applied. The GameValio Recommendation shown separately is our own suggestion for each game, based on a weighted score that combines quality (reviews), popularity (player counts), and affordability (price vs value) into a score out of 100. These are two different things: the comparison is objective, the recommendation is GameValio's opinion.
Is Cubic Odyssey worth buying over Smalland: Survive the Wilds?
Based on the metrics, Smalland: Survive the Wilds won the direct comparison. However, also check the GameValio Recommendation for each game and the price comparison table to make the most informed purchase decision.
Which game has better player reviews?
Review score trends and volume over time are shown in the charts section above. The game with consistently higher positive ratios has stronger community reception.
Which game offers better value for money?
The affordability score and price comparison table above highlight the best deals. Smalland: Survive the Wilds currently scores better on value relative to its quality and price.
Analysis updated: Jun 4, 2026, 12:09 PM UTC